b'every outcome except for satisfaction with outcome. In no case did court perform better than restorative justice. Rather, restorative justice always held an advantage. Poulson concluded, The data in this review were consistently favorable to restorative justice when compared to adjudication. If outcomes such as fairness, accountability, satisfaction, contrition and forgiveness, emotional well-being, and feelings of safety are important, then restorative justice is the clear choice. (Poulson, Barton (2003). A Third Voice: A Review of Empirical Research on the Psychological Outcomes of Restorative Justice Utah Law Review. 2003(1): 167-203. University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law. ) James Madison University offers one example of a campus model for incorporating restorative justice and other restorative practices into student judicial processes. (See jmu.edu/judicial/restorative) Written by Melanie G. Snyder, Restorative Justice Practitioner and author of Grace Goes to Prison: An Inspiring Story of Hope and Humanity CONSIDERING MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES IN ACADEMIC INTEGRITY CASES Role of the Faculty Academic integrity violations can sometimes be manifestations or symptoms of underlying emotional orTraumatic Experiences226'